El Niño Snow Forecast 2026–27: Where the U.S. Could See More and Less Snow
Update log (1)
- — Expanded with the station record. The page was directional — which regions lean which way — and now carries inches: the 1991–2020 normal for 27 US metros beside what the eight strongest El Niño winters actually delivered there, detrended. The finding is the asymmetry (Buffalo about 15.6 inches below trend against Baltimore about 3.0 above) and that exactly one metro, Denver, was snowier in a majority of those winters. The page still refuses to forecast a total for this winter, and the section saying so was rewritten to keep that distinction explicit now that numbers appear.

- There is no official snow forecast for this winter, from NOAA or anyone else. What exists is a record of what past El Niño winters did, and NOAA’s flagship Winter Outlook — issued in autumn — covers temperature and precipitation, not snowfall totals.
- NOAA’s own conclusion from that record is that El Niño suppresses snow across more of North America than it adds to. Its phrase, from an analysis of 1959–2023, is that it appears to be the great snowfall suppressor over most of the continent.
- The gains cluster in the Southwest, the southern Rockies and the high country of California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona, plus the high plains, the Mid-Atlantic and the southern Appalachians.
- The losses run from the Pacific Northwest and northern Rockies across the Great Lakes to interior New England, and cover most of Alaska. On 13 August the Climate Prediction Center put a very strong event above 90% — but a stronger El Niño does not reliably mean more snow.
- Put in inches, the pattern is lopsided. Across 27 metros, the eight strongest El Niño winters ran about 15.6 inches below trend in Buffalo, 14.0 in Cleveland and 13.1 in Detroit — while the largest gain anywhere was Baltimore at plus 3.0 inches.
- Exactly one of those 27 metros, Denver, was snowier than trend in a majority of the eight winters. Detroit and Indianapolis were snowier in none of them.
There is no snow forecast for this winter. NOAA does not publish one, and neither does anyone else who can be checked.
What does exist is a record of what happened in past El Niño winters — and NOAA’s summary of that record is that El Niño takes snow away from more of North America than it gives it to.
Where could the U.S. see more or less snow?
The gains are narrow and mostly high up; the losses are broad and northern.

| Region | Signal in past El Niño winters |
|---|---|
| Sierra Nevada and Southwest | Above average |
| Southern Rockies | Above average |
| High plains — eastern Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, northern Texas | Above average |
| Mid-Atlantic | Above average |
| Southern Appalachians — West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina | Above average |
| Pacific Northwest | Below average |
| Northern Rockies | Below average |
| Great Lakes | Below average |
| Interior New England | Below average |
| Most of Alaska | Below average |
NOAA’s 1950–2009 analysis puts the largest positive departures in California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona — the high country reached by the subtropical jet, where the extra moisture stays frozen.
Five entries on each side is not a 50-50 split. NOAA’s finding from the longer 1959–2023 record is that the below-average area is larger than the above-average area, which is why its summary sentence is about suppression rather than balance.
How much snow did those winters actually take away?
Enough to be worth a number — and the losses are far bigger than the gains.

Everything above this point is directional — which regions lean which way. This is the same question asked with a ruler.
The eight strongest El Niño winters on record were pulled from the Oceanic Niño Index (any of them peaking at +1.6 °C or higher): 1958, 1966, 1973, 1983, 1992, 1998, 2016 and 2024. For each of 27 US metros with a published snowfall normal, the chart shows what those winters delivered against the underlying trend.
The asymmetry is the finding. Buffalo’s eight-winter average runs about 15.6 inches below trend. Cleveland is 14.0 below, Detroit 13.1, Indianapolis 12.1, Boston 11.8. The largest gain anywhere in the set is Baltimore at +3.0 inches, with Washington at +2.8.
That is what NOAA’s phrase about suppression looks like when you put inches on it: the cities that lose, lose a foot or more; the cities that gain, gain an inch or three.
What a normal winter brings, and what those winters brought

Anomalies are hard to feel. Absolute inches are not.
| Metro | Normal (Dec–Feb) | Those eight winters | Against the trend | Snowier in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo, NY | 70.1" | 52.5" | -15.6" | 2 of 8 |
| Cleveland, OH | 45.7" | 25.8" | -14.0" | 1 of 8 |
| Detroit, MI | 35.4" | 19.1" | -13.1" | 0 of 7 |
| Indianapolis, IN | 21.2" | 7.4" | -12.1" | 0 of 8 |
| Boston, MA | 37.7" | 22.1" | -11.8" | 1 of 8 |
| Chicago, IL | 29.6" | 18.8" | -9.9" | 0 of 6 |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 32.7" | 21.4" | -8.9" | 1 of 8 |
| Minneapolis, MN | 31.9" | 22.1" | -8.1" | 2 of 8 |
| Denver, CO | 20.6" | 23.1" | +0.8" | 5 of 8 |
| Washington, DC | 11.6" | 15.3" | +2.8" | 4 of 8 |
| Baltimore, MD | 16.4" | 18.5" | +3.0" | 4 of 8 |
Read the Buffalo row as the shape of the whole thing: a normal winter brings about 70 inches, and those eight winters averaged about 52. The city still got buried. It got buried less.
And read the Baltimore row as the limit of the good news: a normal winter brings 16.4 inches, those winters averaged 19.5. Real, and small.
How thin is the evidence?
Eight winters thin — which is why the counts are published rather than only the averages.

An average of eight numbers can hide a lot. A metro could show a mild negative because seven winters were near normal and one was catastrophic, which is a different world from eight consistently quiet ones.
So here is the count. Of the 27 metros, exactly one — Denver — was snowier than trend in a majority of those eight winters. Detroit and Indianapolis were snowier in none of them.
That is a strikingly one-sided record, and it is still only eight winters. Both of those sentences are true and the second one is the reason this page will not turn any of it into a forecast.
Is there an official snow forecast for this winter?
No — and this is the part most coverage gets wrong.
| Product | What it actually gives you | When |
|---|---|---|
| ENSO Diagnostic Discussion | El Niño strength and probabilities | Monthly — next on 10 September |
| CPC Winter Outlook | Temperature and precipitation probabilities | Autumn |
| A national seasonal snowfall map | Does not exist | — |
Even the flagship Winter Outlook, the one whose maps circulate every October, forecasts temperature and precipitation, not snowfall totals. Seasonal snowfall is not something NOAA issues as a national forecast. So an article promising how many inches your state will get this winter is working from something other than a NOAA forecast.
What did NOAA just say about El Niño’s strength?
Very strong is close to settled. Record-breaking is likely but not certain.
| CPC figure, 13 August 2026 | Value |
|---|---|
| Alert status | El Niño Advisory |
| Very strong event, autumn–winter | Greater than 90% |
| Historic event, October–December | 69% |
| Niño-3.4 index, July | +1.4 °C |
The synopsis reads that El Niño is strengthening, with a greater than 90% chance of a very strong event during Northern Hemisphere autumn and winter 2026-27. The 69% figure is the probability that October to December exceeds every El Niño back to 1950.
The gap between those two numbers — about 21 points — is the part still open. It is not whether this is a big event. It is how big.
Does a stronger El Niño mean more snow?
No, and NOAA says so directly.
The composites are averages of past events, and NOAA warns that stronger events do not reliably produce stronger impacts. The most recent very strong El Niño inverted part of the expected west-coast pattern, which is exactly the kind of thing a composite of twenty-odd events cannot rule out.
A record-strength event is a reason to expect an unusual winter. It is not a reason to expect a snowier one, and for most of the northern tier the historical lean runs the other way.
Why can a wetter winter be a less snowy one?
Because snow needs the moisture and the cold in the same place, and El Niño moves them apart.
El Niño pulls the subtropical jet north and east across the southern United States. That wets the southern tier, and it weakens the northern storm track, which dries the north. Snow follows only where the wetter air is also cold enough — which is why the gains cluster in high country and the Mid-Atlantic, and why a wetter-than-normal winter in the Southeast can still be a nearly snowless one.
What this article cannot tell you
How much snow will fall where you live this winter. No forecast total for any location appears on this page, because no defensible source produces one at this range.
The inches above are a different thing, and the distinction matters. They are a record: what normally falls, and what actually fell in eight past winters that resembled this one in a single respect. A record of the past is not a prediction of the future, and eight winters is a thin record even of the past.
It also cannot tell you whether this winter behaves like the composite at all. The sample is thin, the last very strong event broke part of the pattern, and the drivers that decide any individual month are not predictable months ahead.
For the temperature and precipitation maps NOAA does publish, see the El Nino winter outlook . For the temperature side of the same winter, see our 2026/2027 US winter forecast . For what happens to the event after it peaks, we looked at the decay year .
Sources
| Source | What it supports here |
|---|---|
| NOAA Climate Prediction Center: ENSO Diagnostic Discussion | The 13 August 2026 alert status, the greater-than-90% and 69% probabilities, the July Niño-3.4 value, and the 10 September date for the next discussion |
| NOAA Climate.gov: S(no)w pain, S(no)w gain — how does El Niño affect snowfall over North America? | The 1959–2023 composite, the “great snowfall suppressor” conclusion, and the regional pattern of above- and below-average snow |
| NOAA Climate.gov: Snow during El Niños from 1950 to 2009 | The largest positive departures being in California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona |
Checked 18 August 2026. This article contains no snowfall totals and no seasonal snow prediction. No affiliate links, and no payment was received for any link on this page.
How we verified this
✅ The metro figures are computed from station data, not repeated from NOAA. Eight analog winters were selected from the Oceanic Niño Index at a +1.6 °C threshold, and each metro’s snowfall was compared against its own 1991–2020 normal. 🔴 The anomalies are DETRENDED. Comparing raw snowfall across 1958–2024 confounds the El Niño signal with the warming trend; on an earlier winter page that mistake produced a north–south pattern that vanished once the trend was removed. The ranked chart and the counts use the residual series. The normal-versus-actual chart shows raw inches and says so. ⚠️ One first-order station stands in for each metro, and snowfall varies sharply across a metro area. Three of the 30 metros have no published snowfall normal and are absent. The single most important thing on this page is that no snow forecast exists. NOAA does not issue a national seasonal snowfall map. Its flagship Winter Outlook, published in autumn, forecasts temperature and precipitation probabilities. Any article giving a snowfall total for a state this winter is not working from a NOAA forecast, and this page prints no totals for anywhere.
The regional pattern comes from NOAA’s own composites, and is labelled as a retrospective throughout. The 1959–2023 analysis, based on ERA5 data and published by NOAA Climate.gov, compares snowfall in El Niño winters against the 1991–2020 average. A separate Climate.gov analysis covering 1950–2009 is the source for the largest positive departures being in California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona. Both describe what happened in past events. Neither is a prediction of this one.
The strength figures are from the Climate Prediction Center discussion issued 13 August 2026, read on the CPC’s own page: alert status El Niño Advisory, greater than 90% chance of a very strong event for autumn and winter 2026-27, and a 69% chance that October–December exceeds every El Niño back to 1950. The next discussion is scheduled for 10 September 2026, and those numbers can move.
The chart shows five regions on each side, and that is not the same as a 50-50 split. NOAA’s finding is that the below-average area is larger than the above-average area. The chart’s own footnote says so, because five bullets against five bullets would otherwise read as a balance that the underlying maps do not show.
This page replaces an earlier one on the same subject. The previous version, published 13 August, carried the same NOAA sources and the same conclusions; this one is organised around where the snow goes, adds the source table the earlier page lacked, and the old URL redirects here.
Nothing here forecasts snowfall, and nothing here says this winter will resemble the composite. Twenty-odd events is a thin sample, the most recent very strong event inverted the expected west-coast pattern, and the drivers that dominate any individual month — the Madden-Julian Oscillation, the polar vortex — are not predictable at this range.