Drawpie Explainers & tools

Farage Wins the Clacton By-Election: So Why Did Count Binface Get 27%?

Update log (1)
  • — The result was declared on the morning of 14 August. Every figure here is the returning officer's declared count for a poll held on 13 August; no recount has been reported.
Farage Wins the Clacton By-Election: So Why Did Count Binface Get 27%?
Photo by Jonas Jacobsson on Unsplash
Key takeaways
  • Nigel Farage held Clacton on 13 August 2026 with 22,239 votes, 63.34%, from a turnout of 35,111. The satirical candidate Count Binface finished second on 9,455 votes, 26.93%. The reason a novelty candidate reached 27% is on the ballot paper: Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens all declined to stand.
  • Those four parties took 24,219 votes between them in Clacton in 2024 — 52.7% of everything cast. Count Binface’s 9,455 is 39% of that. Roughly six in ten of the people who backed a mainstream opposition party two years ago did not turn out for the alternative.
  • Farage’s own vote barely moved: 21,225 in 2024, 22,239 now, a gain of 1,014. His share rose 17 points because turnout fell by 10,847 votes, not because he won people over.
  • It is still the best parliamentary result of Count Binface’s career by a distance. Parliament’s results service records the party’s previous best as 308 votes, in one seat in 2024. Only two of the 34 candidates cleared the 5% needed to keep a deposit.

Nigel Farage held Clacton on 13 August 2026 with 63.34% of the vote, and a man in a bin-shaped helmet finished second on 26.93%. Count Binface’s 9,455 votes are the strangest-looking number in British politics this week, and the explanation for them is not really about Count Binface at all.

It is about who was not on the ballot paper. Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens all declined to contest the seat. Between them, those four parties won more than half the vote in Clacton two years ago.

What was the Clacton by-election result?

Farage 22,239, Binface 9,455, on a turnout of 44.37%. The result was declared on 14 August by Tendring District Council, which ran the poll.

CandidateVotesShare
Nigel Farage22,23963.34%
Count Binface9,45526.93%
John Stevens4921.40%
Tony Francis4321.23%
Pamela Walford3711.06%
Laurence Fox3470.99%
William Clouston2560.73%

Twenty-seven further candidates polled below that. The majority was 12,784, from 35,111 votes cast, and the field of 34 candidates is the largest ever recorded at a UK parliamentary election — the council’s own description of it.

Why did Count Binface get 27% of the vote?

Because there was nobody else to vote for. This is the whole answer, and it is visible in the 2024 result for the same seat.

Party in 2024VotesShare
Reform UK21,22546.2%
Conservative12,82027.9%
Labour7,44816.2%
Lib Dem2,0164.4%
Green1,9354.2%

The four parties in the bottom four rows took 24,219 votes between them, 52.7% of everything cast. None of them put up a candidate this time. A voter in Clacton who wanted to register a vote against the sitting MP had, in practice, one recognisable name to do it with.

That is what 26.93% measures. It is the size of the hole the mainstream parties left, partly filled.

Did Nigel Farage actually gain votes?

Barely. He gained 1,014 votes and 17 points of vote share, and those two facts are not the same thing.

Measure20242026
Farage votes21,22522,239
Farage share46.2%63.3%
Votes cast45,95835,111
Turnout58.0%44.4%

His raw vote rose by 4.8%. His share rose by 17.2 points, because the denominator fell: 10,847 fewer votes were cast, a drop of 23.6%. A 63% share reads like a surge and is mostly an emptier hall.

That cuts both ways, and it is worth saying plainly: a 12,784 majority in a seat he won by 8,405 two years ago is still a comfortable hold, in a contest his opponents chose not to enter.

What happened to Clacton’s 2024 opposition vote?

Most of it stayed home. Take the four parties’ 24,219 votes from 2024 and set Count Binface’s 9,455 against them: he collected 39% of that bloc.

Look at it a second way and the same picture appears. In 2024, 24,733 people in Clacton voted for somebody other than Farage. This time 12,872 did — almost exactly half. Of those who did turn out and did not vote Farage, 73.5% chose Count Binface, which is the part of the result that is genuinely about him: when the anti-Farage vote showed up, it went almost entirely to one place.

So both readings are true at once. The opposition consolidated, and the opposition shrank.

Is 27% a big result for Count Binface?

By his own standards it is enormous. Parliament’s election results service records the Count Binface Party’s previous parliamentary best as 308 votes, in a single seat at the 2024 general election. This is 31 times that.

His larger vote totals have come in London mayoral elections, where the electorate is a whole city rather than one constituency. In a parliamentary seat, 9,455 is a different order of thing entirely — and second place is not something novelty candidates get.

What it is not is evidence of a national movement. A satirical candidate who is the only alternative on the paper is doing a job that four parties declined to do, and the size of the number reflects their absence more than his support.

How many candidates lost their deposit?

Thirty-two of the 34. A UK parliamentary candidate pays a £500 deposit, returned only if they poll more than 5% of the valid votes.

Only Farage and Count Binface cleared it. Third place, on 492 votes, was 1.40% — nowhere near. That is £16,000 in forfeited deposits from a single by-election, which is what a record-breaking ballot paper costs the people who fill it.

Why was there a Clacton by-election at all?

Because the sitting MP resigned the seat and then stood for it again. Farage announced on 7 July 2026 that he would vacate Clacton and re-contest it, and he has now been returned by the constituency he left five weeks earlier.

The resignation came while the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards was examining an allegation that he failed to declare a £5m gift. He firmly denies it and no finding has been made against him. Reporting on the by-election notes that the inquiry resumed once he was returned to the Commons, because the standards process can only proceed while its subject is a sitting MP — a description of how the mechanism works, not a claim about why he resigned.

We wrote about the contest before it happened, when the question was whether a comedian in a bin could actually beat him . The answer turned out to be the one the arithmetic always pointed at, by a wider margin than in 2024.

What the result does not tell you

Why anyone voted the way they did. There is no exit poll for a by-election, and 9,455 people put a cross next to Count Binface for 9,455 reasons that nobody has measured.

It does not tell you that Clacton has moved. Farage’s own vote is up by a thousand in a contest where the four parties that finished second, third, fourth and fifth in 2024 were absent; there is no like-for-like comparison to make.

And it does not tell you what happens next. The standards inquiry is unresolved, and the outcome of an unresolved inquiry is not something to guess at — including here.

How we verified this

The result is the returning officer’s, and the comparison is Parliament’s. The vote totals, the turnout percentage and the record 34-candidate field come from Tendring District Council, the authority that ran the by-election and declared it. The 2024 general election figures used for every comparison are the published Clacton result from that election. Nothing here is a projection or a poll.

The arithmetic in this article is ours, and it is all reproducible from those two result tables. Farage’s 1,014-vote gain, the 10,847-vote fall in turnout, the 24,219 total for the four parties that stood in 2024 and did not stand this time, and the 39% and 73.5% figures are subtraction and division applied to the two declared results. We have shown the inputs so you can check them.

No betting odds appear in this article. An earlier piece on this contest quoted a bookmaker’s price before polling day; that line has since been removed from it, and nothing of the kind is used here.

The standards investigation is reported as an allegation, because that is what it is. The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards is examining whether Nigel Farage failed to declare a £5m gift. He firmly denies it, no finding has been made, and nothing in this article should be read as suggesting one has. Reporting that the inquiry resumed after his re-election, because such inquiries can only proceed while the subject holds a Commons seat, is a description of the process and not a statement about his motives for resigning.

We do not print a claim that this is a record for a satirical candidate. It plainly is a record for Count Binface in a parliamentary seat, and Parliament’s own results service supports that. Whether 26.93% is the highest share any novelty candidate has taken in British parliamentary history is something we could not establish from a source we trust, so we have not asserted it.

We have not tried to explain what voters were thinking. There is no exit poll for a by-election, and any account of why individual people voted for a man in a bin-shaped helmet would be invention. What the numbers support is a statement about who was on the ballot and who turned out, and that is as far as this goes.